Legal Opinion

Forney v. State Ethics Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1981No. 1003 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The members of the board of the Patton-Ferguson Joint Authority, a municipal authority created pursuant to the Municipality Authorities Act of 1945, Act of May 2, 1945, P.L. 382, as amended, 53 P.S. §301 et seq.; the Authority’s Executive Secretary; and its Solicitor have filed a Petition for Review seeking in-junctive relief from the financial disclosure provisions of Section 4 of the Act of October 4, 1978, P.L. 883, as amended, 65 P.S. §404 (Ethics Act). Section 4 requires compensated public officials and public employees to file annual statements disclosing their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. McCreary v. MajorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Lighton v. Abington TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Commonwealth v. Erie Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Kosek v. Wilkes-Barre Township School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Independent Enterprises Inc. Thomas Lozecki v. Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Kremer v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Crossley v. LiebermanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Aronson v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Williamstown Borough Authority v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API