Legal Opinion

Gassert Ex Rel. Gassert v. Commercial Mechanisms, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 12, 1979No. 49126PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Plaintiff Howard Gassert brought suit for injuries sustained by his son when struck by a pitching machine manufactured by defendant Commercial Mechanisms, Inc. (CMI). CMI moved for summary judgment in Carlton County District Court on the ground that, as a defunct Missouri corporation, it was not capable of being sued for injuries occurring after it had dissolved. The trial court denied the motion but certified to this court the following question:

“Can plaintiff maintain a suit for personal injury against a dissolved Missouri corporation on a cause of action arising subsequent to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chadwick v. Air Reduction CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  2. Bishop v. Schield Bantam CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1968
  3. Bazan v. Kux MacHine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Bruun v. Katz Drug Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Kratky Ex Rel. Witthans v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. In re All Cases Against Sager Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. McCormack v. Citibank, N.A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API