Legal Opinion

Fidelity Financial Corp. v. Federal Home Loan Bank

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 3, 1983No. C-82-1389 SWPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART, AND DENYING IN PART, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW

Defendant Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco’s (Bank’s) motion to dismiss plaintiff Fidelity Financial Corporation’s (Fidelity’s) claims for failure to state cognizable claims for which relief may be granted, requires this Court to accept Fidelity’s allegations of Bank’s ‘dastardly deeds’ in connection with the events leading to its closure and federal receivership, as true. On that premise, defendant’s motion is hereby GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part.

T…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fidelity Financial Corporation v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, Milton Feinerman, President of the Federal Home Loan Bank of S.F.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. MATEER T/A SUMMIT HILL RADIO & TV v. Reliance Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Coy U. Spawn, Jr. v. Western Bank--Westheimer, Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. Brezinski v. F.W. Woolworth Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1986
  5. Eureka Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. KidwellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API