Legal Opinion

Middleton v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2014No. 20130395PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Gerald Ray Middleton appeals from a district court order denying his application for postconviction relief. We affirm because trial counsel’s procedurally deficient motion for a new trial was not proven to prejudice Middleton.

I

[¶ 2] Middleton was found guilty by a jury of continuous sexual abuse of a child, a class AA felony, and corruption of a minor, a class C felony. After the trial, attorney Steven M. Light, now deceased, was substituted as Middleton’s new counsel. Middleton then moved for a new trial. The brief in support of Middleton’s motion stated, in its…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Heckelsmiller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brewer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Chatman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Campbell v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Edwards v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Schweitzer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API