Legal Opinion

City of Gilroy v. Kell

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1924No. Civ. No. 4780PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a decree adjudging that the City of Gilroy is the owner of the right to take water from Uvas Creek in the county of Santa Clara, state of California, at a point where it has erected a dam across the same upon certain real property described in the complaint and owned by the defendants. The further provisions of the decree will be discussed hereinafter.

Plaintiff alleged that it was the owner of said right to take water from Uvas Creek and also of certain dams and pipe-line beginning at the upper end of said dams and running down and along the westerly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allen v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. North Fork Water Co. v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Burris v. People's Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Oneto v. RestanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Humphreys v. BlasingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. McMorris v. PaganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Costa v. FawcettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Signorelli v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API