Legal Opinion

Metz v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1913No. 18,148PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Dickinson district court; Roswell L. King, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action to recover damages for injuries received by a stallion in an interstate shipment on appellant’s railroad from Burr Oak, 111., to Abilene, Kan. No member of the appellee firm was present at the place of shipment, but the horse, with three others, was in the charge of one Sackett, who signed the contract of shipment as agent of appellee and acted as caretaker of the • horses from Burr Oak to Abilene. That the horse was injured by the negligent operation of the train by appellant’s employees is not controverted, neither is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. LattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Southern Nursery Co. v. Winfield Nursery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kirby v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Kennedy v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Zoller Hop Co. v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Donohoo Horse & Mule Co. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Starkweather v. DunlapSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API