Donohoo Horse & Mule Co. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Bourbon district court; Charles E. Hulett, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
An action for the loss of a horse was brought by J. M. Piper against The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company before a justice of the peace of Bourbon county on July 22, 1911, but by an amendment The Donohoo Horse and Mule Company was substituted as plaintiff. The railway company had undertaken to carry the horse in question with other *682horses from Labette, Kan., to Memphis, Tenn., and it was arranged that still other horses should be placed in the car when it reached Fort Scott. Upon arrival at Fort Scott it was found that the leg…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bailey v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Kirsch v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Andrews v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Klotz v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Stockton Elevator & Shipping Ass'n v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.