Legal Opinion

People v. Ballard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the inventory search of his vehicle was pretextual and unlawful. Upon impounding a vehicle, the police may conduct an inventory search of it and of any containers found therein (see, People v Gonzalez, 62 NY2d 386, 388-390; see also, People v Townsend, 152 AD2d 515, appeal dismissed 76 NY2d 746; South Dakota v Opperman, 428 US 364; cf., People v Lloyd, *1026167 AD2d 856). When such search is challenged, the People have the burden of showing that it was "conducted pursuant to standardized procedures” (People v…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Illinois v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RhodesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. Acevedo-SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API