Riley v. Northland Geriatric Center
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentArcher, J.
The majority resolves the conflict present in the Court of Appeals application of this Court’s decision in Gusler v Fairview Tubular Products, 412 Mich 270; 315 NW2d 388 (1981), by holding that (1) the doctrine of res judicata does not bar relitigation of the plaintiffs minimum weekly benefit rate under § 351(1), and (2) our decision in Gusler is retroactively applicable to those parties receiving minimum rate benefits at the time of the decision’s release irrespective of their date of injury.
I respectfully dissent and would hold that res judicata bars relitigation of the plaintiffs’ minimum…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Hlady v. Wolverine Bolt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Socialist Workers Party v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Van Dorpel v. Haven-Busch Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.