Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fraser v. Miller

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2014No. 2012-SC-000829-DGPublished

1ConcurrenceKeller, J.

I concur with my colleagues in this case but write separately as to the issue of informed consent. The majority holds that Miller did not preserve the informed consent issue for two reasons. First, the majority asserts that Miller failed to preserve the informed consent issue when Dr. Fraser moved the court to enter a directed verdict claim on that issue. Second, the majority holds that Miller failed to preserve the informed consent issue by failing to tender a jury instruction regarding informed consent or object to the court’s final jury instructions, which did not discuss informed consent.

A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keel v. St. Elizabeth Medical CenterKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hawkins v. RosenbloomCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API