Legal Opinion · Dissent

Courtright v. Vreeland

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1909Published

Appeal by the defeudant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of ¡¡Slew York, first district, borough of Manhattan.

1Dissent

Dayton, J. (dissenting).

The plaintiffs, on January 22, 1908, were appointed receivers of the Pennsylvania Tanning Company by .a decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Pennsylvania. A certified copy of the decree was admitted in evidence without objection. It appears therefrom that the receivers were empowered to “ bring, prosecute and defend all suits at law or in equity which in their judgment may be necessary for the preservation and protection of the property and interests under their care and control.” On March 23, 1908, one Richard D. IThtoif commenced an action in the Supreme Court, Rew…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Arkell Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API