Legal Opinion

In re the Arkell Publishing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motioh for an order stating priority and amount of preferred1 claims against corporation, in proceedings for voluntary dissolution, upon coming in of referee’s report after reference to take-proof of claims.

1Opinion of the CourtBtsohoff, J.

The questions presented have to do with conflicting claims of the Goelet estate and the Sackett & Wilhelms Company, as preferred creditors, to a certain fund in the receiver’s hands, and, while the moving papers were framed as upon a motion for a reference to determine the facts upon which the dispute is based, it is now conceded that the facts are sufficiently presented by the papers submitted, and that the questions may be determined as raising only matters of law.

The Arkell Company, a corporation engaged in the publishing business was the lessee under a lease from the Goelet estate, of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Giles v. . ComstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. In Re the General Assignment of HatchNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. The Home Life Ins. Co. v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Gugel v. IsaacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. People v. HaddenNew York Supreme Court · 1846

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Courtright v. VreelandAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API