Legal Opinion

Huff v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 22, 1967No. Civ. A. 25463PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVIN, District Judge.

The question raised by the defendants’ motion to dismiss is whether a telephone company and its agent have violated the federal wiretapping law, 47 U.S.C. § 605.

The plaintiffs, Robert Huff and Mary Holt, were employed by the defendant, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, as a mechanic and elevator supervisor respectively. A telephone of the usual type with a regular exchange number was placed in an employees’ lounge of the central offices of the Telephone Company. The employer’s instructions were that the telephone could be used for personal calls but only when necessary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Reitmeister v. ReitmeisterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Alvin Bubis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph CovelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. North Pacific Lumber Co. v. UnisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Harmon v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. CovielloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Lorentz v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API