Legal Opinion

State v. Van Hoet

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 14, 2004No. 90,132PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

The question we must answer is whether K.S.A. 2003 Supp. 22-3428 requires a trial court to commit a defendant who has been acquitted of a criminal charge by reason of a mental disease or defect to the state security hospital for an evaluation for up to 90 days, or whether such a defendant is entitled to an immediate hearing to determine whether he or she is a harm to himself, herself, or others. Our answer is that the Kansas Legislature mandates that the defendant be sent to the state security hospital under the provisions of K.S.A. 2003…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Kansas Department of Revenue v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. State v. DenneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. Kansas v. McElroySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. State v. RoederSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API