Martin Dichner v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Chief Judge.
The principal point raised in this appeal from a conviction for having wilfully made a false statement in order to obtain a FHA loan, 18 U.S.C. § 1010, is whether the false completion certificate, itself undated, was submitted to the bank a few days prior to the date appearing on the loan application, so that the statute of limitations had run. 18 U.S.C. § 3282. We have reviewed the record with care and find no basis for ruling as matter of law that the evidence required a finding favorable to the defendant’s position. It may be that the government is contending for a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Silber v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Max P. Lash v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1955
- Reiss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
3Cited by22 opinions
- Leo J. Schlinsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,069 United States of America v. Howard Smolar, Edward Vanasco, and Sumner H. WoodrowCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Susan Nimrod, Etc. v. Stephen SylvesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Alfonzo Cain, United States of America v. Rommie LouddCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Richard Allen Tanner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.