Legal Opinion

Martin Dichner v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 15, 1965No. 6483PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Chief Judge.

The principal point raised in this appeal from a conviction for having wilfully made a false statement in order to obtain a FHA loan, 18 U.S.C. § 1010, is whether the false completion certificate, itself undated, was submitted to the bank a few days prior to the date appearing on the loan application, so that the statute of limitations had run. 18 U.S.C. § 3282. We have reviewed the record with care and find no basis for ruling as matter of law that the evidence required a finding favorable to the defendant’s position. It may be that the government is contending for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Silber v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Max P. Lash v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1955
  3. Reiss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Leo J. Schlinsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,069 United States of America v. Howard Smolar, Edward Vanasco, and Sumner H. WoodrowCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  3. Susan Nimrod, Etc. v. Stephen SylvesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Alfonzo Cain, United States of America v. Rommie LouddCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  5. Richard Allen Tanner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API