Legal Opinion

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,069 United States of America v. Howard Smolar, Edward Vanasco, and Sumner H. Woodrow

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 26, 1977No. 75-1214-75-1216PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Chief Judge.

Appellants were charged, with two other individuals and two corporate entities, under a twenty count indictment alleging conspiracy and substantive violations of the federal securities laws. 1 On motions at the close of the government’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, the court entered judgment of acquittal on many of the substantive counts. Of the counts that went to the jury, appellant Smolar was convicted on all six counts; appellant Vanasco was convicted on five counts and acquitted on one; and appellant Woodrow was convicted on two counts. Appellants…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. MandelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. DrougasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  5. John K. Lincoln v. Franklin Y.K. SunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API