Baron v. Royal Paper Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
MoGivern, J. (dissenting).
Firstly, nowhere in the record
is the “ legend ” of any accountant, as stated by the majority, to the effect that “ the statement reflected the entries in the corporate books, but no verification beyond that was certified ”. But I do find a legend to the effect that “ The above balance sheet and supporting Schedules A-l to A-7 inclusive are subject to comments contained in the Letter of Transmittal and notes to financial statement which are an integral part of this report ’ ’. And I further find the letter of transmittal of the “ Report of Accounts” bears the ominous…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of SteinwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Aron v. GillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Smilkstein v. J. Smilkstein & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Bankers Trust Co. v. H. Rosenhirsch Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959