Legal Opinion
Bankruptcy Estate of United Shipping Co. v. Tucker Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 27, 1991No. C2-91-402, C5-91-457PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
On appeal from separate grants of summary judgment, United Shipping Company, Inc. (U.S.C.) argues the trial court erred in (1) concluding it had a contract carrier relationship with Tucker Company; and (2) holding neither Tucker nor National Automotive & Rubber Marketing, Inc. (N.A.R.M.) were responsible for freight undercharges because both companies were transportation brokers; and (3) failing to hold both brokers have waived their rate reasonableness defenses. We disagree and affirm as to Tucker, but remand the N.A.R.M. action for resolution of a material issue of fact.
F…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Atlantis Express, Inc. v. Standard Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Jackson Rapid Delivery Service, Inc. v. Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- A.A. Metcalf Moving & Storage Co. v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- In re the Northern State Power Co. for Approval of its 1998 Resource PlanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- A.A. Metcalf Moving & Storage Co. v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.