Legal Opinion

Oates v. City of Niagara Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1998No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying claimant’s application, for *830leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5). Claimant established that, six months after his accident, the City of Niagara Falls (City) received a report indicating that he had injured his knee. The report, however, did not state that claimant had fallen from an elevated platform. Thereafter, the City heard nothing further concerning this matter until it was served with this motion, three months after receiving the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mondaca v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. O'Connor v. Mexico Academy & Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Palumbo v. City of BufFaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API