Legal Opinion

Mondaca v. County of Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioners Lizette Mondaca and her mother Mirta Mondaca appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered May 9, 1991, which denied the application.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

General Municipal Law § 50-e requires that a person who sues a municipality or its subdivision in tort must serve a notice of claim upon the proposed defendant within 90 days of the incident constituting the gravaman of the complaint so that it may have a timely opportunity to investigate the matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Caselli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Ferrer v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Goudie v. County of PutnamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matarrese v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Gangloff v. East Islip School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Oates v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Matarrese v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Traina v. ZambranaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API