Legal Opinion

Venters v. Bunnell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This is an action by the widow of John Venters, deceased, to recover damages for his death resulting from personal injuries received when he was struck by an automobile of defendant B'. E. Bunnell and being driven at the time by his employee, and eodefendant, one O. S. Lanham. By her petition, plaintiff alleges several grounds of negligence, but since the case was submitted solely upon the pleaded humanitarian or last clear chance doctrine, no further reference to the pleadings is necessary.

The trial court’s action in refusing defendant’s instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spoeneman v. UhriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Rollison v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. McCarthy v. SheridanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Dalton v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  5. Jewell v. Excelsior Powder Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Endermuehle v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Calvert v. Super Propane CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Endermuehle v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API