Legal Opinion
State v. Battle, 06ap-863 (4-19-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 19, 2007No. 06AP-863PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Andre K. Battle ("appellant"), appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in which the court denied his petition for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.
{¶ 2} The pertinent factual and procedural history of the case are as follows:
On January 10, 2002, appellant was charged under a multi-count indictment arising out of an incident in which two individuals robbed a Dairy Mart store in Reynoldsburg, Ohio. The matter came for trial before a jury beginning December 9, 2002. The state's witnesses included appellant's…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Holloman, 07ap-875 (6-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Hayes, 08ap-233 (3-12-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. MurphyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Jones, 4-07-02 (10-22-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.