Legal Opinion

United States v. City of Houston

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 21, 1992No. 91-3076, 91-3117PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION OF UNITED STATES FOR ENTRY OF ORDER REQUIRING SPECIAL ELECTIONS

Before JONES, Circuit Judge, DeANDA, Chief District Judge, and LAKE, District Judge. . EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

Having considered the parties’ arguments and the uncontested facts adduced, this three-judge court determines that it is neither appropriate to void the results of Houston’s 1991 City Council elections for nine single-member districts 1 2 and order a special interim election to be conducted, nor is it proper to bow to the City’s request that we retain jurisdiction to order relief in its…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Beer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Perkins v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Hathorn v. LovornSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. City of Lockhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chen v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. White v. State of Ala.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
  3. Dillard v. Chilton County CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
  4. Brooks v. State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1993
  5. United States v. LouisianaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API