Legal Opinion

Tedeschi v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 12, 1982No. 81 Civ. 6938PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

This is a diversity action 1 by Anthony Tedeschi (“Tedeschi”) and his wife Lois against Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc. (“Smith Barney”), an investment banking firm, Martin Berglas, Smith Barney’s assistant general counsel, and John Maine, Smith Barney’s Philadelphia branch manager. The complaint alleges six state-law causes of action. The defendants move under Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss for failure to state a claim as to five of the six counts, and for partial summary judgment as to the remaining count. 2

Tedeschi is a former Smith Barney broker. In…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Fischer v. MaloneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Williams v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Joseph Serfecz and First Chicago Trust v. Jewel Food StoresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Tedeschi v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. Perry v. ManocherianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  4. Anthony W. Tedeschi and Lois Tedeschi, Merrill J. Chapman v. Smith Barney, Harris Upman & Co., Inc., Martin S. Berglas and John MaineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Collins v. Willcox Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API