Legal Opinion

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Olive's Sporting Goods, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 30, 1989No. 88-165PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The Travelers Indemnity Company appeals from a declaratory judgment in favor of its insured, Olive’s Sporting Goods, Inc. The circuit court adjudged gunshot injuries to several persons to be separate occurrences within the meaning of the policy issued by Travelers to Olive’s. For reversal, the appellant argues that: (1) the court erred in finding there was more than one occurrence involved in the litigation; (2) the court erred in holding the contract of insurance ambiguous; and (3) the court erred in finding that the “products hazard” and “completed operations hazard”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Champion International Corporation v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Continental Casualty Company v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Equity Mutual Insurance Co. v. Southern Ice Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Priddy v. Mayer Aviation, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Olive's Sporting Goods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Diamond State Insurance v. Homestead Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Koikos v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Martin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Wintermute v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API