Legal Opinion

Matthews v. City of St. Ann

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 14, 1970No. 54504PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Judge.

By their petition filed August 2, 1968, plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment pursuant to Civil Rule 87 and Chapter 527, V.A.M.S. The trial court sustained defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs have appealed. We reverse and remand.

From the petition of some thirty-eight pages, factually, it appears: that plaintiffs are “residents,- property owners, citizens, registered voters, and taxpayers of the City of St. Ann, County of St. Louis” and that they brought this action for the benefit of themselves and others similarly situated; that defendant city is a municipal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berghorn v. Reorganized School District No. 8Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Cooper Ex Rel. Cooper v. FinkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Stanturf v. SipesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. City of Creve Coeur v. Creve Coeur Fire Protection DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Anderson v. SteurerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claspill v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Citizens State Bank of Nevada v. WalesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Estate of Sample v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API