Legal Opinion

Asnis v. Bankers Indemnity Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 31, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given by Circuit Court Judge Porter.

We deem it desirable to add to his conclusions that in our view the refusal to nonsuit on the ground there was no liability under the terms of the policy was justified.

The provision relied upon by the defendant below reads:

“6. This policy shall apply in the same manner and under the same conditions as it applies to the named assured, to (a) any person or persons while riding in or legally operating any of the said automobiles and to any person, firm or corporation [except an automobile garage,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. LeFelt v. NasarowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Gronquist v. Transit Casualty CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Security National Insurance Company v. Sequoyah MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  5. Collins v. Eagle Indemnity Co.New Jersey Circuit Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API