Legal Opinion

Luis Alvaro Ceballos (Y Arboleda) v. Edward J. Shaughnessy, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization at the Port of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 6, 1956No. 23721_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, an alien, seeks inter alia a declaratory judgment that he is not ineligible for naturalization under 8 U.S. C.A. § 155(c) 1 and, in effect, a stay of deportation until the Attorney General exercises his discretion with respect to plaintiff’s application for suspension of deportation. The complaint, brought against the District Director of Immigration, was dismissed below on the procedural ground that the Attorney General or the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization was an indispensable party.

Judge Kaufman followed and elaborated upon the distinction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaughnessy v. PedreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. De Pinho Vaz v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. Pedreiro v. Shaughnessy, District Director of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ceballos v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Estrada v. AhrensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. Estrada v. AhrensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Paris v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  5. Paris v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API