Randy Deonarinesingh v. United States

Randy Deonarinesingh appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, in which he alleged that his appellate counsel had provided ineffective assistance by failing to challenge on direct appeal the application of the two-level enhancement in U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(10)(B) (providing for a two-level enhancement where the offense involved “the production or trafficking of any (i) unauthorized access device or counterfeit access device, or (ii) authentication feature”). 1 Deonarinesingh pled guilty to bank fraud and conspiracy. 2 In his § 2255 motion,…