Legal Opinion

Howell v. United States

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided July 13, 2020No. 8:20-cv-00476Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION EQUANZICK HOWELL, Petitioner, v. Case No.: 8:20-cv-476-T-27AEP Criminal Case No.: 8:18-cr-146-T-27AEP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ___________________________________/ ORDER BEFORE THE COURT are Petitioner Howell’s Motion Under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (cv Dkt. 3), his Memorandum of Law in Support (cv Dkt. 4), the United States’ Response (cv Dkt. 10), and Howell’s Reply (cv Dkt. 13), Amended Reply (cv Dkt. 14), and Motion to Appoint Counsel (cv Dkt. 9). Upon review, the § 2255…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API