Legal Opinion

Robec, Inc. v. Poul

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 1996No. 03235PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

On April 12, 1993, appellee Robec, Inc., t/a Robec Distributors (“Robec”) instituted a legal malpractice action against certain named and unknown individuals t/a Wolf Block Schorr & Solis-Cohen (“Wolf Block”), appellants herein. Instantly, we are presented with an appeal from the August 28, 1995 order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, granting Robec’s motion to compel Wolf Block to produce certain documents for discovery. We remand this matter to the lower court to prepare a statement pursuant to Pa.R.AP., Rule 1925(a).

In its complaint, Robec avers…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. LuddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Katz v. KatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. McManus v. Chubb Group of InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. PateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Watson v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Knopick, N. v. Boyle, D. and Boyle LitigationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Techtmann v. HowieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Strain v. Simpson HouseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Brown, J. v. Simons, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Feldman v. IdeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API