Legal Opinion

Jim Toyne, Inc. v. Adams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1996No. WD 50433PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPINDEN, Judge.

Jim Toyne, Inc., sued the law firm of Watson, Ess, Marshall & Enggas and one of its *382partners, Phillip J. Adams, Jr.,1 for malicious prosecution of a lawsuit against Toyne in 1988. That first lawsuit ended in 1992 when the plaintiff dismissed it. Toyne responded later that year with this action. The circuit court granted Adams’ motion for a directed verdict at the close of Toyne’s case on the ground that Toyne had not established a submissible case. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Adams filed the underlying lawsuit on October 28, 1988, in federal court on behalf of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Police Retirement System v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Zahorsky v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Petty v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Iseminger v. HoldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. YoungMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Tri-County Equipment & Leasing, LLC v. KlinkeNevada Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API