Legal Opinion

Bellefontaine Improvement Co. v. Niedringhaus

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1899PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Madison county; the Hon. William Hartzell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

Appellees filed a bill for partition of and to remove a cloud from certain lands situated in township 3, north, range 10, west of the third principal meridian, in Madison county, Illinois. The land is bounded on the south by the north line of the south half of section 23, and the western continuation thereof tó the main channel of the Mississippi river; on the north by land of the Granite City, Madison and Venice Water Company; on the east by a channel of the Mississippi river known as “Gaboret slough;” and on the west by the thread of the stream in the main channel of the Mississippi river.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Cooley v. GoldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Zirngibl v. Calumet & Chicago Canal & Dock Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Saulet v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Crow v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Jones v. New Orleans & N. E. R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Bigelow v. HerrinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Yutterman v. GrierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. Crismond v. KendrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API