Claim of Bissell v. Village of Larchmont
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The Tillage of Larchmont, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 5th day of June, 1900, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Westchester Special Term, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 5th day of June, 1900, appointing commissioners to determine the question as to the damages sustained.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
The petitioner alleges that “ the village of Larchmont is, and was at the times hereinafter mentioned,' a municipal corporation,” and that “ section 159 of the General Tillage Law, being chapter 414 of the Laws of 1897 * * * is, and at all the times mentioned herein was, applicable to the village of Larchmont; ” that the said village has exclusive control of the streets; that he is a resident of New Rochelle, and is the owner of certain premises situate in the *62village of Larehmont and fronting on Addison avenue, known as lot No. 16; that during the months of November and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- O'Reilley v. . City of KingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Claim of Phipps v. Village of North PelhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Hunt v. Village of OtegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- In re ComeskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- A. S. Wikstrom, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.