A. S. Wikstrom, Inc. v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtBussell G-. Hunt, J.
Under date of November 23, 1951, the claimant entered into a contract with the State for the excavation and grading (but, not the paving) of a portion of the Tyre-Montezuma section of the Ontario Thruway in Seneca and Cayuga Counties.' The State’s estimate of the cost of the work was $1,981,000; the claimant’s bid was $1,624,286; and, the next lowest bid was $1,859,047 (in this connection, see the minutes relative to claimant’s admissions concerning an underbid).
■ The work was to begin at station 511+00 and end at station 732+50, a distance of 4.15 miles. The special notes, which were a part…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weston v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Claim of Bissell v. Village of LarchmontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Niewenhous Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Niewenhous Company, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- A. S. Wikstrom, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961