Legal Opinion

A. S. Wikstrom, Inc. v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided July 31, 1958No. Claim No. 33300; Claim No. 34584PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBussell G-. Hunt, J.

Under date of November 23, 1951, the claimant entered into a contract with the State for the excavation and grading (but, not the paving) of a portion of the Tyre-Montezuma section of the Ontario Thruway in Seneca and Cayuga Counties.' The State’s estimate of the cost of the work was $1,981,000; the claimant’s bid was $1,624,286; and, the next lowest bid was $1,859,047 (in this connection, see the minutes relative to claimant’s admissions concerning an underbid).

■ The work was to begin at station 511+00 and end at station 732+50, a distance of 4.15 miles. The special notes, which were a part…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Weston v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Claim of Bissell v. Village of LarchmontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Niewenhous Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Niewenhous Company, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A. S. Wikstrom, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API