Commonwealth v. Carey
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Spaeth, J.,
Appellant contends that he did not voluntarily waive his right to a jury trial, and that he is therefore entitled to a new trial.
Appellant and a co-defendant were charged with burglary with intent to commit a felony, unlawfully resisting arrest, and assault and battery. The assistant district attorney agreed with appellant’s counsel that he would recommend probation if appellant would plead guilty, and appellant on the advice of counsel accepted this plea bargain. However, when on September 4, 1969, appellant appeared' for trial before Judge DiBona, this bargain was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. KirklandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. HoutzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. PaysonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. FloydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.