Legal Opinion

State v. Lipscomb

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 25, 2002No. 2000-K-2836PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

807 So.2d 218 (2002)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

Zachary LIPSCOMB.

No. 2000-K-2836.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 25, 2002.

Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, Harry F. Connick, District Attorney, Nicole B. Barron, New Orleans, Scott D. Peebles, Counsel for Applicant.

William R. Campbell, Jr., New Orleans, Counsel for Respondent.

2Per curiam

Although it found on the basis of the trial transcript that the police had reasonable suspicion to stop respondent and to frisk him for weapons, the court of appeal concluded that "the State failed to show that the crack pipe [seized from respondent's pocket] was discovered…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. State v. PrudholmSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MontejoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  2. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  3. State v. SylviaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  4. State v. FieldsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. State v. FosterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API