State v. Watson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
817 So.2d 81 (2002)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Marva L. WATSON a/k/a Lawrence Lackings.
No. 2000-K-1580.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 14, 2002.
Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, Harry F. Connick, District Attorney, Nicole B. Barron, Valentin M. Solino, Scott D. Peebles, Counsel for Applicant.
William R. Campbell, Jr., New Orleans, Counsel for Respondent.
Marvin Waston, Respondent, pro se.
KNOLL, Justice.[*]
Although the appellate court found that the defendant, Marva L. Watson a/k/a Lawrence Lackings,[1] was estopped from raising the issue that evidence seized at his arrest should have been suppressed…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. BeltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- State v. GodejohnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. ChessonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. MontejoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- State v. MatenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- State v. DeclouetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. OttLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.