Commonwealth v. DiMascio
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentLarsen, Justice
I dissent to the majority’s per curiam affirmance of the Commonwealth Court.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (Penn DOT), appellee, was in the process of constructing a “Domar” building1 for the storage of road salt in the Township of Willistown when appellants, the Township and its building/zoning officer, served upon Penn DOT a cease and desist order intended to stop further work on the project until a building permit had been applied for and issued in accordance with local zoning ordinances. Penn DOT then filed a petition for review addressed to the original…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moyer v. PHILLIPS, MDSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Snider v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. Ogontz Area Neighbors Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Carroll v. County of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Middletown Township v. Delaware County Institution DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.