Legal Opinion
STATE, DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES v. Trost
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 26, 1999No. 97DM0155; CA A100064PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*658EDMONDS, P. J.
In this paternity proceeding, the Department of Human Resources and Support Enforcement Division of the State of Oregon (department) appeal from a judgment based on a jury verdict finding that respondent was not the father of the subject child. The department argues that the trial court erred by conducting a jury trial. We affirm.
In April 1996, the department initiated this proceeding by issuing a notice of proposed order and finding of responsibility to respondent stating that he was the father of the child. Respondent denied paternity and, pursuant to an administrative order,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- STATE EX. REL. JONES v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- J. R. Simplot Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Deacon v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- STATE, DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES v. TrostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999