Legal Opinion

Byrd v. &198tna Life Ins. Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1935No. 7 Div. 127PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge..

This suit was founded on a policy of life insurance containing a clause providing for disability benefits in certain contingencies.

It would really seem to be unnecessary to cite authority to the effect that there could be no recovery in the absence-of the introduction into the -evidence on the trial, of the policy — or its essential contents— which was the basis of the claim. That such is the fact will be, we believe, conceded by all concerned to be elementary.

Appellant’s counsel, of course, knew it, for he introduced the policy sued on into the evidence- — as appears. *

But the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pearce v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Forrester v. McFrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 612Alabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. John E. Ballenger Const. Co. v. Joe F. Walters Const. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Byrd v. &198tna Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API