In Re Estate of De Cigaran
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. H. H. Appel, Henry T. Gage, and W. I. Foley, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment given in a proceeding brought under section' 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure to have determined the rights of all persons to the estate of Rosario de Cigaran, deceased.
There is no dispute as to the material facts, which are as follows: Deceased, died intestate. She was an illegitimate child, and had never been acknowledged or adopted by her father. At the time of her death, she was the wife of Vicente de Cigaran, who survives her. She died without issue, legitimate or illegitimate. There also survived her one Mrs. Refugio Padilla, who was also an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re Estate of WardellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- In re the Estate of GorkowWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Marshall v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- In re Estate of IngramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In re Estate of CarmodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Brundy v. CanbyMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Wolf v. GallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Estate of PatersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bahnsen v. BurlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.