Legal Opinion

Campanella v. Commerce Exchange Bank

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 2000No. 76772PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James M. Porter, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Commerce Exchange Bank (“Commerce”) appeals from a judgment following a jury trial in favor of plaintiffs-appellees Robert P. Campanella and his wholly owned company, Robert P. Campanella and Associates, in the amount of $24,530.66 plus, prejudgment interest. Defendant Commerce contends the trial court erred in not granting its motions for summary judgment, a directed verdict or j.n.o.v. based on the doctrine of collateral estoppel. Defendant also contends that the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence and that the trial court erred…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Horton v. Harwick Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brian Uszak v. AT&T Mobility ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. Kassay v. Niederst Mgmt., Ltd., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  3. State Ex Rel. Bayus v. Woodland Park Prop., 05 Ma 169 (6-22-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Big Lots Stores, Inc. v. Jaredco, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
  5. Ohio Farmers Insurance Company v. BurchDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API