Legal Opinion
Wilkins v. Wilkins
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 18, 1940PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
The law of this case was enunciated in the opinion in the case of Wilkins v. Wilkins, 141 Fla. 188, 192 Sou. 791, in which we held:
“The appellees should be required to convey to the appellants the real estate remaining vested in them, or either of them, subsequent to January 1, 1931, and .should be re quired to account for and pay over to the appellants either in kind or the value of all bonds and other personal property which came into the hands of appellees or either of them from W. C. Wilkins or his estate subsequent to January 1, 1931, less such amount as the court below may find to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones Trustee Etc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Gaines v. RuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Fricker v. Americus Manufacturing & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Myers, Receiver v. MatusekSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Axtell v. CoonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Firestone v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- In Re General Coffee Corporation, Debtor. City National Bank of Miami and City National Bank Corporation v. General Coffee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. StutsmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Edenfield v. CrispDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.