Legal Opinion

People v. Allnutt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1989No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his inculpatory statement. Defendant was present when the police, pursuant to a warrant, searched his residence. The People admit, as found by the suppression court, that defendant was in custody prior to his statement and had invoked his right to counsel. Further, no Miranda warnings had been given defendant.

It was developed at the hearing that two police investigators were with defendant in his bedroom when one of the investigators found a small canister containing what…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. RiversNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. LynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. FerroNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. HuffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. BentonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. LuffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. JabbarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API