Legal Opinion
Piet v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 8, 1959No. 322-58PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
Meyer Piet, to be referred to as Piet, and Futurecraft Corporation, a California corporation, to be referred to as Fu-turecraft, instituted this action against the United States on April 11, 1958, to recover compensation for use of an alleged invention represented by Letters Patent No. 419,471, entitled “System and Valve Mechanism for Rocket Propulsion”. The application for the patent was filed on March 29, 1954. On the same day an assignment of the entire rights, title and interest in the application and the invention, as well as any letters to be granted, was made…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Egbert v. LippmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. David H. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- James C. Hobbs v. United States of America, Atomic Energy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- The Robbins Company v. Lawrence Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.