Legal Opinion

State v. Harding

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 27, 1981No. 51437PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of charges of criminal sexual conduct in the first and second degrees, Minn.Stat. §§ 609.342(b), 609.343(b) (1980), and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum prison term of 20 years for the more serious offense. On this appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends (1) that both his convictions should be reversed outright on the ground that the evidence of his guilt was legally insufficient, (2) that, failing that, he should be given a new trial on the ground that the trial court prejudicially erred in admitting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HesseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. State v. MattesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. State v. VolstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. WaukazoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State v. BirdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. DudreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. City of St. Paul v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. HardingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API