Nickelson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Judge.
After being provided a complete eviden-tiary hearing on his Rule 27.26 motion, mov-ant appeals the trial court’s denial of the motion. He bases his appeal on ineffective assistance of counsel; we affirm the trial court’s action.
Movant was convicted of stealing a motor vehicle and sentenced under the Second Offender Act to seven years imprisonment. The judgment of conviction was affirmed in State v. Nichelson, 546 S.W.2d 539 (Mo.App.1977), which sets forth the facts supporting the conviction. The appeal from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion charges that the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. NichelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Aikens v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. WashingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. HollensbeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Taylor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979