Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1979No. 40357PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Movant has appealed the trial court’s denial of his Rule 27.26 motion. His appeal alleges that the trial court erred in failing to make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law and that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of first degree robbery, and his appeal from the judgment of conviction was affirmed in State v. Taylor, 538 S.W.2d 761 (Mo.App.1976). With assistance of counsel, movant filed a Rule 27.26 motion for post conviction relief which was denied by the trial court after complete evidentiary hearing but without…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jay Randall Wolfs v. R. G. Britton, Superintendent, Tucker Unit, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Brewster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Walker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gardner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Herron v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API