P.I.M.L., Inc. v. Fashion Links, LLC
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum of Law and Order
DAVIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case is before the Court on the motions by all defendants for summary judgment on Plaintiff P.I.M.L.’s claims for breach of contract, violations of Minnesota Statute § 181.145, and quantum meruit. The Court heard oral arguments on February 3, 2006.
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Since this case is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, “the inferences to be drawn from the underlying facts ... must be viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spectro Alloys Corp. v. Fire Brick Engineers Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Goodbye Vanilla, LLC v. Aimia Proprietary Loyalty U.S. Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018